Supranational Banking Scam to Disarm Britain

Published on UK Column (http://www.ukcolumn.org)
Mon, 01/11/2010

As our troops fight and die overseas, the Tory Government is playing out instructions from the Supranational Banks to force Britain to integrate its military capability with Europe

Brian Gerrish, Lt Cdr RN Rtd

The lie is that we, as a Nation, are bankrupt and therefore we must suffer massive public sector spending cuts to our military and public services in order to help balance the books. The lie is simple, but it is still a lie. Britain is not bankrupt. The International Banks are bankrupt and have hung their £6 trillion of debt around the neck of the British Nation.

When a company or sole trader becomes insolvent, receivers are called in to manage the companies affairs, to try and salvage the company as a going concern, and in the worst case, to pay off those who are owed money by the insolvent company. Having placed a company in Receivership, the existing company Directors are hardly the best people to leave controlling the company. A priority will be to remove the company Directors from their posts, or to monitor them in their execution of the receivers instructions.

Yet none of this has happened with the International Banks. Having passed through insolvency and into bankruptcy, the Banks have not only been allowed to continue to trade, their debts have been covered from the public purse. This would appear to be madness, but is in fact, much more serious. The failure of the banks is being used as the excuse to strip the UK of effective Armed Forces and a credible defence of the Nation State.

We do not need defence cuts, we should simply throw away the worst banks, write off the debts - vast as they are - and leave the bankers to suffer their well deserved bankruptcy. The Government should then print and issue its own money (charging a modest and necessary interest) to fund the Nation’s defence. The same should be done for funding of all other necessary public services and infrastructure. Aside from removing excessive bank interest, better known as usary, from the backs of the population, the government will then be able to more easily and effectively manage inflation, by direct control over the issue of currency, and the growth of the money supply.

Conservative Smokescreen Of Defence Budget Shortfalls

Piggybacking on the chaos deliberately created by the NuLabour marxists Blair, Brown and Co, Cameron has quickly set the Armed Forces against each other. The Army, under huge pressure from conflict and deaths in the field, is played against the Navy and the Air Force, and all are forced to scrabble for a better share of an ever decreasing funding pot. Under the smokescreen of politically driven inter-service angst, rivalry and ignorance, the respective Chiefs of Staff have been duped into scrabbling for military assets, rather than standing back and first assessing the nature and scale of the threats against which Britain must defend itself, if we are to be safe in an increasingly turbulent world. The first threat they should recognise is subversion within the UK, funded, propagated and controlled by the privately controlled banks nested in the City of London - the majority of which are under supranational, and EU, not national control.  What allegiance do these people have to Britain - if any? What is their background and have they been security been vetted? These questions are never considered by Chiefs of Staff, and certainly never answered. Instead they are pulled ever closer to the hypnotic effect of the disappearing ‘funding pot’, and ever further from the reality of banks creating money from nothing in the first place.

Decline of Independent British Military capability - Rise of the EU Battle Group

But why should NuLabour and Cameron’s NuTories drive such a destructive agenda. The clue comes from the ever increasing growth of the European State, which openly seeks to make itself a world power, and which therefore needs fully integrated European armed forces under centralised European control. Professional and powerful, the British armed forces must be reduced to a position of near impotence, so that they can only function by deriving ever closer integration and ‘partnership’ with European forces.

The EU has been steadily and stealthily moving towards the creation of 13 EU Battle Groups. These will be multi national, where national command and control is first divided and then buried in a nebulous network of partnered armed forces.

It was not until 1992 and the Maastricht Treat that common foreign and defence policy were made part of EU law. The 1997 Amsterdam Treaty massively expanded the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy CFSP. The plot thickened in 1999 when the EU Political and Security Committee was established consisting of the EU ambassadors of members states and the Military Committee consisting of members states Chiefs of Defence Staff. When was the British public fully informed of this erosion of sovereign military power?

In 1999 under the Helsinki Headline Goal, the EU established an EU rapid reaction force of circa 60,000 men with self sustaining capability, including intelligence, air, naval and combat support, sustainable for a year up to 6,000 km from the borders of the EU.

By 2003 the idea of EU Battle Groups was first suggested at the Franco-British Summit in Le Touquet and was adopted in 2004. Thirteen Battle Groups are being created with 1500 troops each. Allowing for rotation this equates for a force of some 156,000 combat soldiers. The Battle Groups have been given the authority to operate in any part of the world. Pity the British public have not been told of the details and the cost of these forces.

World Socialism In The Shadows

Cameron is already hastening this, and other EU defence integration plans by calling for British tanks and armour to be withdrawn from Germany. He intimates that there is no threat for them to face in mainland Europe. He is a fool or a liar, or probably both. The Soviet Socialist system of Russia remains alive and well, and heavily armed. It just remains hidden under the cloak of Glasnost. The World Socialist movement still seeks World Domination under a single One World Socialist Government - just ask any member of the Fabian Society. If we remember the roots of the European Union are socialist, the jigsaw begins to come together. Why can’t our highly paid Chiefs of Staff see this?

In Plymouth it has taken a small group of senior ex-servicemen to stand up and fight the treasonous Tory proposals to shut Devonport Naval Base - 330 hectares of the most capable naval facilities in Europe. They have also exposed the Cameron lie that the new Queen Elizabeth class carriers are too big to enter Plymouth Naval Base. The carriers can enter Plymouth just as other large older carriers were able to. The real argument is not should we retain Plymouth or Portsmouth as our only naval base outside of Scotland - we need both if we are to maintain the necessary size, capability and credibility of our armed forces.  We also need to retain credible naval facilities in Scotland.

For Cameron to propose scrapping the Royal Navy / Royal Marines Amphibious capability is another wanton act of treason against the safety of the nation. Not only are HMS Ocean and Bulwark highly capable amphibious ships, they are effectively ‘new’. To scrap this capability, removes not just the hardware but the know-how and operational experience.  Military equipment, including ships, can be replaced, but trained, experienced manpower is grown over more than one generation.

Despite over 12,000 people signing a Plymouth petition against Cameron’s disasterous naval cuts, local Tory MP Oliver Colville is largely silent. It is rumoured he has been warned by Tory central office to keep quiet - the last thing Cameron needs is the local MP reacting to local concerns and actually supporting his constituents.

Wave Bye Bye To The British Independent Nuclear Deterrent

Over 5 years ago the staff of the UK Column warned that it was EU policy to emasculate British conventional armed forces and to strip Britain of its independent nuclear deterrent. More recently we asked serious questions concerning the collision between the British nuclear deterrent submarine Vanguard and its French counterpart Le Triomphant on the 3 or 4th February 2009. Just how was it possible for these two ballistic missile submarines to collide in a vast Atlantic Ocean, particularly when Vanguard is equipped with the very best submarine detection equipment? It has to be to do its job.

To collide, these submarines must have initially been operating in adjacent patrol areas, or other close proximity - a highly unusual situation for secretive nuclear deterrent submarine operations, where vessels aim to hide away from other units.  Noting that NuLabour has already given away the British nuclear industry to the French, another clue emerges as to the fate of an independent British nuclear deterrent.

Barely reported in the press, Gordon Brown held talks in London in early 2010 with French President Sarkozy, concerning the ‘sharing’ of nuclear deterrent submarine patrols. As is usual, the talks were covered by the smokescreen of “Britain has so far opposed the idea on the grounds that pooling of sovereignty would be politically unacceptable.”

The Guardian reported on 9 October 2010 that:

A report dismissed on both sides of the channel as speculation and therefore probably true, that the UK and France are negotiating an agreement which would see British nuclear warheads serviced by French scientists.” True to form the EU aligned Guardian shows its true colours as a government propaganda machine by adding that the report “does not go far enough......French defence analysts rightly say for this to happen Britain would have to break its special relationship with America in this field......It makes eminent sense for two European military powers, both of whom have nuclear deterrents which are independent in name only, to operate with each other on warheads and joint submarine patrols.

Smooth as silk, the Guardian slides out the intended future EU policy on the back of speculation. In reality the collision of Vanguard and Le Triomphant is almost certainly the result of joint nuclear deterrent operations gone wrong. Both submarines were close. Close enough to collide. The stunning silence concerning the collision, the true extent of the damage and the lack of any visible board of investigation or Court Martial, underlines political manoeuvring in the dark. Far from future policy, the traitors within the LibLabCon are already giving away Britains nuclear capability, whilst frantically dismantling independent conventional capability. We will all suffer unless we wake up fast.

UK Column, County House, 12/13 Sussex Street, Plymouth PL1 2HR - 01752 312743 - editor@ukcolumn.org

The UK Column is not affiliated with any political party.

---

Source URL: http://www.ukcolumn.org/articles/supranational-banking-scam-disarm-britain

Links:
[1] http://www.ukcolumn.org/category/channels/front-page
[2] http://www.ukcolumn.org/category/channels/economy
[3] http://www.ukcolumn.org/category/channels/politics

The Shape Of Things To Come

Posted By The Editor On September 10, 2008 @ 8:01 pm In Mike Robinson 

In the very near future, we will all be able to stop worrying about the UK. We won’t have to worry about the economy, immigration, education or the health service. The sheer determination of the majority to deny reality and immerse themselves in reality TV guarantees the end of the UK as a nation state.

The internationalists, currently centred in, but with no allegiance to, London, have a plan which guarantees that outcome. That plan has existed for many years, at least in general terms. In fact, its not even a private plan, since, among other examples, H.G. Wells put pen to paper to write “The Shape Of Things To Come. ^[1]“

Wells’ was very much an internationalist. His vision of the future is one where the world quite literally goes to hell through global conflict and disease, where the population has been reduced to that which, by coincidence, is presently demanded by Prince Philip ^[2], and before him, Wells’ pal Bertrand Russell ^[3].

The world is to be run by a handful of super-conspirators, Oligarchs, who will dismantle nation states. Here’s a short clip from the 1930s film version of Wells’ story.

things_to_come_clip_ ^[4]

Echoing Wells’ vision, the EU has been developing a five year strategy for justice, home affairs and security  for 2009-2014. The proposals are set out by the shadowy “Future Group,” set up by the  Council of the European Union, and include a range of  highly controversial measures including new  technologies of surveillance, enhanced cooperation with the United States and harnessing  the “digital tsunami”. In the words of the EU Council presidency, “Every object the individual uses, every  transaction they make and almost everywhere they  go will create a detailed digital record. This  will generate a wealth of information for public  security organisations, and create huge opportunities for more effective and productive public security efforts.”

Statewatch ^[5] has produced a major new report ^[6], The Shape Of Things To Come, named after Wells’ vision, which examines the proposals of the Future Group and their effect on civil liberties. It shows how European governments and EU policymakers are pursuing unfettered powers to access and gather masses of personal data on the everyday life of everyone – on the grounds that we can all be safe and secure from perceived “threats”.

The drive for that Wellsian society is quickening each and every day. Are you still determined to ignore reality? Or are you, at last, ready to join in the fun ^[7], and work with us and others to stop this nonsense?

---

Article printed from The UK Column: http://www.ukcolumn.org

URL to article: http://www.ukcolumn.org/2008/09/10/the-shape-of-things-to-come/

URLs in this post:

[1] The Shape Of Things To Come.: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/w/wells/hg/w45th/

[2] demanded by Prince Philip: http://www.propagandamatrix.com/prince.html

[3] Bertrand Russell: http://news.aspects.cc/economy/genocide

[4] things_to_come_clip_: http://www.ukcolumn.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/things_to_come_clip_.flv

[5] Statewatch: http://www.statewatch.org/

[6] new report: http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/the-shape-of-things-to-come.pdf

[7] join in the fun: mailto:editor@ukcolumn.org

EU Marxists Penetrate Westminster

Posted By The Editor On January 22, 2010 @ 12:38 pm In Article, Brian Gerrish 

British Democracy On A Knife Edge

Whilst British troops die and are maimed in the wastes of Afghanistan, supposedly protecting their families and country from ‘international terrorists’, the very people who created the world wide terror programme are hollowing out democracy at home. Marxists have penetrated the EU and Westminster, and they are building a dictatorship in Britain and Europe.

Further critical evidence of marxist penetration of the European Union is emerging. A string of communist placemen, all associated with oppressive regimes are being exposed within the EU Commission. Working with well informed Russian dissidents, with access to Kremlin and KGB records, Gerard Batten UKIP MEP has recently bravely challenged the EU to remove this malign influence. His words will of course fall on deaf ears since the EU is itself a creation of Fabian Marxism. A slow creeping ideological cancer that has now spread within the western world including the UK. It is coupled to Marxists and other communists now blatantly visible within Westminster. We ignore this spread of cancer at our peril.

Whilst many still believe the EU is democratic, with a free vote in the European Parliament, the truth is that a secretive and powerful Commission drives the agenda for the creation of a massive European superstate. This body is anything but democratic. In fact the European Commission acts as an powerful secretive executive of the European Union with 27 Commissioners. It is responsible for proposing legislation, implementing decisions, upholding the Union’s treaties and the general day-to-day running of the Union.

Only those who have lived through cold-war communism both in the Soviet Union and East Germany for example can appreciate the fear and oppression. Secret police, hidden gulag prison camps, arrests, spies, mistrust amongst neighbours, propaganda and a life of serving the State. Have you noticed the proliforation of police state regulations now blighting Britain. Not to mention the CCTV cameras, 20,000 public official snoopers, politically correct speech, Vexatious Threat Asssessment Centres where the police and psychiatrists can section people for thinking about crime, and courts with no juries. Under Fabian Blair, supported by Labour, Conservatives and Lib Dem MPs, the UK was happy to launch illegal wars, assist in torture and run a BBC propaganda programme to cover up the truth. Are these all coincidences?

In the West, we were fooled into thinking that with the fall of the Berlin Wall came the fall of communism. Nothing is further from the truth. The face of communism changed but behind the scenes the cruel communist dream of “one world government, the abolition of the nation state and their replacement by regions, was to be accompanied by the destruction of the family and the crushing of Christianity. Let’s also not forget that environmental issues were also to be more important than man.”

A great many people warned us that we were being deceived – dissidents, military and religious leaders, some politicains, researchers, authors and more. Despite their best efforts papers, reports, books and even films were overshadowed by the massive media campaign for Glasnost spewed out by the BBC and mainstream media.

To understand how our own media betrayed us, we need to look behind the scenes at who controls and pays for them. Deeper research will show it is the same bankers who have funded the rise of communism since the Bolsheviks. Unpalatable but not untrue.

Whilst many have laughed at the leadership of UKIP, and those fighting for Britain, Batten deserves recognition for sticking his neck out to name dangerous people within the EU.

The same EU that is making our laws and now claims to run our justice system. But where are Cameron and Clegg in all this. Silent and increasingly complicit in denying the truth about the EU. Their blue and yellow rinse supporters follow like lemmings. Batten states:

“Mr Barroso himself was a member of an underground revolutionary Maoist party, at the time when such parties were directed from Beijing in the same way as the Communist Parties were controlled by Moscow. He reportedly left it only in 1977, after China abandoned its worldwide subversive network. The Maoist brand of communism was the foulest of all and the Chinese Communist Party is estimated to have been responsible for the deaths of at least eighty million of their own people. [Ed - We should note here that this foul Chinese system was greately praised by the banker Rothschild as an excellent example of social control.]

Five Commissioners-designate include Communist apparatchiks: Siim Kallas, Maroš Šefcovic, Štefan Füle, Andris Piebalgs and Janez Potocnik. [More detail on these individuals is given at the end of this article] All of these men served oppressive communist regimes or were members of communist parties. Another candidate, Maria Damanaki, is the former Greek Communist Party MP. Communist parties are by their nature non-democratic, and wherever they have achieved power, oppressive.

Baroness Ashton, designated as the EU’s High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, was the Treasurer of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament in Britain in the early 1980s and was allegedly a communist sympathiser. I recently supplied Mr Barosso with information indicating that during her time as CND’s Treasurer unidentified donations may have included money channelled from the Soviet bloc. Baroness Ashton has so far failed to give a full and clear answer to these accusations. If they are true it shows that she was prepared to accept money from Britain’s enemies to undermine the foreign and security policy of her own country and that of NATO. That being the case she can hardly be a proper person to entrust with the EU’s foreign and security policy now.

Joaquín Almunia belongs to the Marxist wing of the Socialist Workers’ Party in Spain. He was a minister in the SWP Government in 1986-1991, under Felipe Gonzalez. This Government was fanatically pro-Kremlin and enthusiastically supported the Soviet project of the creation of a ‘common European home’, it also opposed the independence of the Baltic states. As SWP leader in 2000, Almunia was personally responsible for its infamous electoral coalition with the communist-dominated ‘Izquierda Unida’ block. The candidature of László Andor is strongly objected to by many Hungarians, and others, on the grounds of his allegedly Marxist views and former closeness to the Hungarian Communist Party. One of the few real powers this Parliament has is the ability to reject the Commission. It is our duty to hold the Commission candidates accountable for their pasts. No one who worked for, collaborated with, or was in any way compromised by their association with communist regimes is fit to be a Commissioner in what at least purports to be a democratic institution. Too many questions remain unanswered. The new Commission must be composed of new people with clean records.

Some of you may recall that in April 2006 I asked for a Parliamentary enquiry into the allegations of my constituent Alexander Litvinenko, a former Lieutenant Colonel in the Russian FSB, that a former President of the Commission, Romano Prodi, had been an agent of some kind of the KGB. This enquiry never happened and Mr Litvinenko was murdered before I could bring him to the Parliament to openly discuss his allegations.

The allegations about the communist past of some of the proposed Commissioners must not similarly be ignored. Those of you who maintain that the democratic credentials of the EU can be improved must form a consensus across the political spectrum to reject the proposed Commissioners and demand one composed of genuine democrats.

Therefore I call on all MEPs of whatever political affiliation or group membership to vote against and reject the currently proposed Commission as unfit to represent an institution that purports to be democratic.”

Encouragingly, but with little time left, other are supporting batten and the UKColumn in highlighting the deliberate destruction of democracy in UK. John Laughland mail on Sunday wrote in Feb 2000 “Why activists and communists will soon run British justice.” He stated: But it is the court in Strasburg which will sit atop this new judicial pyramid … it is here that the threat to civil liberties is at its greatest … since 1990 the council of europe has gone on an expansionist binge bringing in new members from nearly all of the countries in formerly Communist Eastern Europe and many from the former Soviet Union, including Russia … consequently there now sits in Strasburg a man who worked for the Communist government of Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, a woman who enforced communist law in Bulgaria under Todor Zhivkov and a man whose career began during the rule of Albania’s Enver Hoxha, the most hideous Stalinist dictatorship Europe has even seen.”

Strasburg and the European Court of Human Rights are of course supported by everybody from Jack Straw (‘forner’ communist) to that pinnacle of truth Cherie Blair (husband Chair of the Fabian Socialist movement).

Former communists (really?) in power at Westminster include Mandy Mandelson, Bob Ainsworth Milliband brothers, Reid, Hain, Treisman, Brown (helped into power by the Scottish Communists and with Charles Whelan, a former high ranking communist, his principal spin doctor). Mandelson is of course a great friend of the Rothschild banking empire that so praised the Chinese communist experiment that murdered 60 million? people.

Even Melony Phillips from the Daily Mail, has started waving a red flag of warning. On Nov 9 2009 she wrote a major article warning..”We were fools to think the fall of the Berlin Wall had killed off the far Left.They’re back and attacking us from within.” Her text states…” the republic of Euroland puts loyalty to itself higher than that to individual nations and their values. It refused to commit itself in its constitution to uphold Christianity, the foundation of western morality … Instead it committed to moral and cultural relativism, which sets group against group and guarantees supreme and anti-democratic power to the beaurocrats setting the rules on ‘diversity’ and outlawing all dissent from pemitted attitudes.” These are fine and astute words. What a pity the Daily Mail failed to report 3,000 demonstators at Parliament demanding a referendum on the impending Lisbon Treaty – an unlawful treaty later signed by the treasonous communist Brown – the Mail instead preferred to write for 8 days on the danger of plastic bags. Credit where it’s due though – Phillips has woken up as has Peter Hitchens. Many more journalists need to as they will be the first to be silenced in a dictatorship. Try asking the dead and missing journalists and investigative reporters in the new ‘CCCP democracy’ of Russia. The impending revolution in UK will, if allowed to manifest, eat its young. That includes men, women and children, Jew, Muslim and Christian, gay, straight and bisexual alike.

We should not forget that the Marxist menace has long been gnawing at the British establishment. The cambridge spies Blunt and Co, Harold Wilson and others in his government were all extreme socialist and too close to the Soviet Union. The General Secretary of the Transport and General Worker’s Union, Jack Jones, was recently exposed as being a KGB agent. In his latter years Jones still vetted Labour candidates – we can only guess what attributes he was looking for. A young Blair?

Peter Oborne is another journalist now looking in the right place. On Saturday 2 Jan 2009 he wrote under “I spy a mystery”. “Last week, I asked Gordon Brown yet again to withdraw his effusive words of praise for trade unionist Jack Jones in the light of the revelation that Jones had been a paid Soviet agent for many years. And yet again he has refused to do so. This is mysterious and I will be looking much deeper into old labour’s connection with Soviet communism in the weeks to come.“

Are people waking up to the treason within Britain? Finally, yes. But it needs to be faster and on a massive scale, since the police state doors are closing. A word of advice for Oborne and his fellow journalists is time is short. The marxist cancer seen in Labour is now also in the Tories and Lib Dems, just as it always was in communism and fascism. Today it takes a Fabian form. Across politics, parties, third sector and civil service, it is hidden in full light of day. As such it can be destroyed, but only when the majority of people lawfully rebel to reject and destroy it. Journalists and media people have a moral and professional responsibility to assist.

• Siim Kallas. Member of Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) 1972-1990, apparatchik in Soviet Estonia’s Finance Ministry 1975-1979; Director of the ESSR’s Central Board of the (state owned) Savings Bank 1979-1986; Deputy Editor-in.Chief of the Estonian Communist Party’s daily newpaper, Rahva Haal, 1986-1989; Chairman of the ESSR’s Central Association of Trade Unions, 1989-1991.
• Maroš Šefcovic. Former member of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, student at Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO), known to be a “KGB incubator”.
• Štefan Füle. Member of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia 1982-1989; a graduate of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO). Worked for the Foreign Ministry of communist Czechoslovakia since 1987.
• Andris Piebalgs. Communist Party of the Soviet Union member during the late 1980s, and an official at Soviet Latvia’s Ministry of Education in 1988-1990.
• Janez Potocnik. Formerly a mid-ranking apparatchik (Assistant Director of Institute of Economic Analysis and Development in Ljubljana) in communist Yugoslavia.

---

Article printed from The UK Column: http://www.ukcolumn.org
URL to article: http://www.ukcolumn.org/2010/01/22/eu-marxists-penetrate-westminster/